Retail Banking: Managing Complexity without Reducing Choice
On March 3 The Access Group, in collaboration with The Glasgow Group
and PostStone, convened a conference for bankers and observers of the
banking industry. It was a series of conversations on customer focus in
the multi-channel environment. The conference was chaired by Alan Kay
of The Glasgow Group and Rick Wolfe of PostStone. Over the course of the
day there were four roundtable sessions, using the PostStone Kitchen Table
model. The first of these sessions was a panel of bank consumers (college-age adults), the rest of the Kitchen Table sessions were made up of bank
executives and industry commentators. In this report from Susan Abbott,
key themes from the day are discussed.
Executive Summary
Retail bankers are giving more than lip-service to the concept of customer
focus and integrated delivery across channels. The channel development
mantra now is consistency, not expansion of all functionality to all channels.
The data management challenges of new environmental demands such as privacy
and regulatory tracking combine with new internal requirements for performance
management data, and expanding external requirements to deliver consistently
and effectively for customers. These were the major themes of a day-long
series of executive panels kicked off with a consumer roundtable discussion.
All the channels, all the time
A major challenge for FIs is responding effectively to the explosion
of customer segments in the long tail. This was illustrated neatly by
a handful of twenty-somethings in a consumer panel who described a wide
range of behaviors and attitudes toward retail financial services. Some
already value their friendly relationship with their local tellers, who
they see as a source of help and good advice. Others use telephone banking
almost exclusively. Still others rely so much on ATMs, they can no longer
remember at what branch they opened their account.
Cash continues to resonate at the emotional level for some, providing
a sense of ownership and control. Debit is great for day-to-day purchasing,
especially for anything over $20, but not “for a bagel”. For
some, debit helps with staying on their budget, whereas cash just disappears.
But cash holds its place in the social world – you may pay for the
movie ticket with a debit card, but you take cash along for drinks out
with your friends.
“I feel like my $40K education has given me nothing …
it’s useless”
“I have so much debt, it will take me ‘til my 30’s to pay
off”
Two Students
The consumer panelists had a relatively pessimistic view of their ability
to move out of the parental home, anticipating they would be in their
30s before being able to afford their own place. The burdens of
tuition weigh heavily on those in university and professional schools,
many of whom lead lives of surprising financial complexity. Learning the
ways of adult financial affairs was a painful and frustrating experience
for some, of “lessons learned” and the need to “feed
the VISA”. The suggestion that credit card debt could be consolidated
into a cheaper term loan sparked interest from one young person financing
her own orthodontics by credit card.
“I’d like the bank to take me seriously. I have $800 a
month in payments. I can’t even start saving to get a life for myself.”
Student
"The bank always finds a way to get more money from the customers.
It won’t benefit me as much as I’d like it to.”
19-year-old employed male
If this group was any representation of their cohort, a tremendous opportunity
exists to provide education in the basics of household finance. FI communication
efforts to reach this group appear to be missing their target: no one
is picking up the household budgeting brochure.
Savvy Consumers: Banks are Businesses
Although the young adults were not very knowledgeable about financial
products, they harbored no illusions about the bank as a business with
profit goals that is looking after its own interests. They are also conscious
of their own lack of context – they don’t know if they are
getting good service or not. At the same time, there is a desire for personal
advocates, for help and advice to achieve a particular goal. When there
is no significant lending relationship in place, the teller is the person
who is seen as the source of this guidance – even though the teller
might be no older or truly more knowledgeable than the customer. And there
is some affection for the first bank that helps, “like your first
love”.
“People do not migrate. Each channel is important in its own
right.”
FI Executive
The Migration Myth
For the financial executives, the channel discussion among the young
adults was another confirmation of a well-established trend: old channels
don’t go away when new channels enter the mix. Awareness is high
that even discussing the concept of channels is just so much “bank-speak”
when it comes to customers, who are thinking in terms of access, not channels.
"It’s not necessarily about a seamless experience across
all channels; it could be a consistent experience within the channels.”
FI Executive
While multiple channels bring strategic and operational challenges, they
are also a source of competitive advantage for banks vis-à-vis
non-banks. Adding new functionality to a channel is an expensive proposition,
and not necessarily desirable as an end in itself. Some observers noted
that consumers are seeking assistance in achieving personal goals from
the bank, not looking for specific products, even as a young adult. FIs
see the branch as the touch-point that drives 90% of a customer’s
choices, despite being present in only 10% of the transactions.
The Quest for Consistency and the Challenge of Integration
The notion that all channels need to offer all things to customers has
been replaced by concerns about consistency. Consistency is not necessarily
about what a customer can do in a given channel, but more about consistency
in expectations and consistency in delivery.
"You’ve got to get over the mindset of thinking of yourselves
as the destination. You’re not. You’re a very important enabler.”
Dr. Alan Middleton
This increasing focus on creating a differentiated customer experience
is leading to greater efforts to integrate across organizational silos.
Organizations are changing their structures to achieve better alignment
around the importance of the customer experience. One example: RBC Financial
Group has created a head of distribution strategy, bringing banking, investments,
insurance, and branch location decisions under one individual.
Overcoming the fragmented feel of multi-channel banking is about creating
a consistent and integrated customer experience that supports brand differentiation.
Access Strategy versus Distribution Strategy
Dr. Alan Middleton, Executive Director of The Schulich Executive Education
Centre, challenged FIs to stop talking about distribution and start thinking
about access – where customers want to use the capabilities that
banks can provide. He acknowledged the tension between meeting the diverse
needs of a large number of customer segments, and the challenge of serving
many segments profitably. Among his prescriptions for change:
- Learn to understand what the lives of your customers are about and
stop thinking of them as just customers
Focus on managing the experience at all customer touch-points as the
key input to the brand, much more important than the brochures
- Develop partnerships to support access strategies, rather than trying
to own channels
"It’s a leap of faith. If we understand your needs and
help you make money, you will buy our product.”
FI Executive
Industry executives, however, noted that being all things to all people
may not be popular from the standpoint of business theory, but it has
protected the industry from any number of wrong moves in the past as a
natural hedging strategy.
Customers themselves are forces in shifting the landscape, turning offerings
targeted at one segment into utilities for another. Direct investing was
offered as a case in point, which quickly became popular with the affluent
investors that banks were prepared to provide personalized services for.
While access to good behavioral data has grown, it is still “rear-view
mirror”, and cannot provide insight into the demographic and psychographic
trends that ultimately drive changes in future behavior.
Although conversant with the concept of lifetime value of a customer,
the executives were somewhat unwilling to accept the premise that they
can truly measure or manage this, despite access to excellent CRM data.
The operative theory is that being sufficiently proactive will mean you
offer the customer what they need before they enter the shopping phase,
and avoid losing their business elsewhere.
As providers of the full value chain, retail banks struggle at times
to form a view of where value lies. The mutual funds industry, by contrast,
was offered as an example where competitive advantage lies in distribution,
but profitability is better in manufacturing. The somewhat arbitrary alignment
of revenues and expenses integral to internal accounting and profit measurement
were seen by many as an impediment, at times, to doing the right thing
for customers and for the enterprise. Some of the FIs present allocate
all revenues and expenses to branch transits, while others have shifted
to a system of recording internal P+L along the lines of customer segments
(CIBC for example).
Service Experiences Difficult to Brand
Executives are thinking about branding strategies, but acknowledged that
few banks have distinctive brands. They attribute this to the complex
and nebulous nature of service experiences, as well as the difficulty
in achieving consistent delivery. While access to touch-points may be
critical to stay in the game, it may be a weak differentiator compared
to the quality of the experience. People are still the essential element
in creating the experience, especially when things go wrong.
Other challenges include making standardized advice feel personalized
and individualized to customers. Rather than trying to inject artificial
intelligence into the customer experience, there is some shift to seeing
these systems as a complement to well-trained staff to maximize the potential
of personal interactions between banker and customer.
“Fraudsters are not product centric”
FI Executive
Data Meta-Strategies Needed to Accommodate Wide Range of Needs, Internal
and External
New environment forces are creating other types of pressures on the legacy
organization structures of banks, where systems and people are aligned
around products, not clients. Operational effectiveness in a multi-channel
environment is an important theme, but data security and new reporting
requirements are closely related.
Cross-channel delivery is often dependent on manual interventions between
systems not designed to integrate; and manual processes are seen as sources
of error that irritate customers as well as being inefficient.
“We talk about authenticating the customer. But how do customers
authenticate that the bank is the bank?”
FI Executive
Multi-channel, multi-product fraud has led at least one FI to consolidate
all fraud management in a single organizational unit.
FIs are looking at data security as a specific class of multi-dimensional
risk to be managed. While they want to manage the situation, they believe
that no strategy can be 100% certain, and it is impossible for them to
eliminate risk. The cat-and-mouse game with criminal elements has led
to the creation of 24/7 monitoring groups that are always challenged to
stay one step ahead of new incursion strategies.
Information and Privacy Commissioner Dr. Anne Cavoukian challenged the
industry to shift the mindset from one of avoiding privacy risks, to thinking
of the regulations as an opportunity to create a competitive advantage.
The recent security scandal at ChoicePoint in the U.S. was offered as a watershed
event that will change people’s views of the value and importance
of privacy regulations. The Commission’s research shows that about
one-quarter of citizens are “Privacy Fundamentalists,” two-thirds
are “Privacy Pragmatists,” and one-in-ten are “Unconcerned.”
The banks have noticed a shift in customer perceptions of fraud security:
rather than being annoyed at being contacted about a questionable transaction,
customers are now grateful that their bank “is watching.”
“How do you architect your data management to meet all the needs
and still keep functioning as a bank?”
FI Executive
Where CRM infrastructure was largely seen as a marketing tool in the
past, it now offers the potential to capture and honor customer preferences
about information sharing.
Incentive and performance management systems have created their own layer
of data requirements that are shifting and evolving. Regardless of the
measurements used, FIs believe that staff know how to “game”
any system, and significant effort is expended to “negate unintended
bad behaviors.”
Outsourcing of back-office functions also raises the issue of data security.
Some jurisdictions, notably, are seen as strongly supportive of data
security; others, less so. Gartner director Stessa Cohen noted that at
least one U.S. bank, known to have outsourced cheque processing, will not
confirm either the country or the outsource supplier, suggesting they
fear the reputational repercussions of making this information public.
FIs are still at the early stages of accommodating the new demands on
data provision and data security. They are striving to develop a shared
language to discuss the issues both internally and with customers. They
are still forming views of the life cycle of information. Current data
architectures were not built to accommodate the needs of various regulatory
bodies, privacy protection, and cross-channel, customer-centric data management.
They are seeing a need for data meta-strategies that go beyond the tactics
needed to achieve any one of these missions.
"The technology gets easier; it’s the processes that are
tough.”
FI Executive
Operational Automation
Where back-office automations have been truly successful, these have
created completely different processes, and can sometimes support the
customer experience. One example mentioned was RBC’s cheque imaging
project, which cut retrieval time – and customer enquiry resolution
time – by eight days. The ideal in operational efficiency improvements
is creating a much better customer experience as well as a more efficient
process.
FI executives are looking to have a set of decision-making factors in
place before introducing new technologies or processes. They are looking
to see that the changes benefit more than one line of business, and are
neutral or favorable to customer experience. They are working towards
more integrated inter-operability of systems, even as they acknowledge
the organizational forces at play that support fragmentation.
A given technology is not seen as being secure – security comes
from looking at the end-to-end process, including fulfillment, and securing
the entire process. Once a process has been redesigned, the key is putting
it into operation successfully.
"There are no challenges to execution for effective executives
in effective firms”
Brendan Calder
Operational Execution: Courage and Decision Making
Brendan Calder offered up his view of the responsibility matrix as the
path to good execution, where clear roles are established for everyone:
who is responsible (R), who is going to do the work (W), who is involved
in consensus (C), who has input to decisions (I), who is advised before
(AB), and who is advised later (AL).
While most agreed that senior management support is the key essential
to prevent projects from becoming derailed, establishing who is at “the
top” for many types of decisions is not always clear. Because of
the organization structures, the cross-over point between silos may be
higher than initially seems necessary. Misalignment of objectives or success
measures across lines of business can be a major impediment to getting
things done. Executives advised others to focus persistent efforts for
as long as needed to obtain buy-in from diverse groups of internal stakeholders
with different needs and objectives.
Effective execution relies on the courage of leaders inside an organization
that supports honesty, and focuses on fixing problems rather than laying
blame.
Working with External Partners
A forthright discussion between FIs and their key external partners presented
some courageous admissions, and some useful observations on the process:
- FIs don’t always confess that they just want competitive intelligence
from their supplier representatives, and instead suggest that “fake
BS projects” may be in development
- External partners don’t always acknowledge the complexity of
either the systems environment or the regulatory environment when they
are approaching FIs with solutions
- External suppliers would be greatly assisted with context by being
invited to occasional customer research debriefs or interactions with
front line staff
- When looking at outsourcing, there need to be real arbitrage opportunities,
skill deficits or strategy gains to be achieved – not hoped-for
efficiencies just by virtue of moving a function out. No one accepts
the notion that outsourcers can make a profit while retaining all the
staff and all the functionality as before
- Partners need to be clear where their solution fits inside the end-to-end
value chain, and consider the other parts of the process in terms of
both design and implementation
- Efforts of external partners to understand the complex environment
of FI stakeholders and decision-making processes are appreciated
- FIs find it frustrating when external suppliers suggest that “out-of-the-box”
technology will integrate with their legacy infrastructure, as this
is rarely their experience
- FIs generally believe that no system or process is error-free, and
would rather hear an honest appraisal of risks, mitigation and recovery
strategies than claims for perfect processing
The Panel Discussions
Multi-channel customers: How do we serve them?
How do we develop them? What do we need to do to align our organization to
serve them competitively?
Dr. Alan C. Middleton, Executive Director, Schulich Executive Education
Centre
Christian Findlay is currently Senior Vice-President, Distribution Strategy
for RBC and Chairman, RBC Action Direct.
Indi Pokhai is currently Director, Processing Support within Global Operations
CIBC.
Julie Sheen is currently Vice President, Term Investments, BMO Bank of
Montreal.
Lisa Ritchie is currently Head of Customer Knowledge and Insights for
Scotiabank.
Normand Zucco is Vice President, Integrated Distribution and Operations
BMO Bank of Montreal.
Tess Lamirande is currently Senior Director, Business Transformation,
within the Global Operations Group of CIBC.
Operational Automation of the Seamless Customer Experience: What will
it take?
Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D., Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario
Glenn Blaylock, Senior Vice President, Enterprise Operations, RBC
Irene Sobolewski is Senior Vice President, RBC Enterprise Applications.
Jacki Challenger is currently the Vice President of Service Delivery
at RBC.
Normand Zucco is Vice President, Integrated Distribution and Operations
BMO Bank of Montreal.
Shelly Swanlund is currently Senior Director, Service Experience Branch
& Small Business Banking CIBC.
Stessa Cohen is a research director in Gartner’s Financial Services
Banking sector.
The key to success to any financial institution is in the execution.
What are the key challenges we face and which of these can be addressed
most quickly and how? Are there best practices that we can follow?
Brendan Calder is currently Effective Executive in Residence and Professor,
Rotman School of Management and a corporate director.
Carolee Birchall is Vice-President and Senior Risk Officer, Technology
and Solutions BMO Financial Group.
Dan Rees, Vice President, Corporate Human Resources, Scotiabank Group
Jacki Challenger is currently the Vice President of Service Delivery
at RBC.
Robin Clyke, Senior Product Manager, Cash Management Products, CIBC
Ruth Abbott is the Lead, Strategic Planning and Marketing for OMERS.
Stessa Cohen is a research director in Gartner’s Financial Services
Banking sector.
Tom Vassos, Marketing Manager, IBM
Thought Partners
Access Group Research is enriched by our thought partners.
Expert facilitation of our conferences and roundtable events is provided
by Alan Kay of the Glasgow Group and Rick Wolfe of PostStone.
Informed analysis is provided by Susan Abbott of Abbott Research &
Consulting.
Valuable counsel was provided by Joshua Mendelsohn.
Rick Wolfe is President of PostStone Corp., a market research
and consulting firm. Rick began his business career with the advertising
agency McCann Erickson, working with the company in Toronto and then
in Tokyo.
Since 1991 his firm has specialized in value proposition development.
Among the organizations the company provides business services to are
TD Bank, RBC, Sun Life Financial, Aeroplan, The Art Gallery of Ontario,
The Royal Ontario Museum, The Canadian Marketing Association, the Executive
Education Centre at the Schulich School of Business, Ontario Media Development
Corp. and IBM.
Rick is a native of Toronto, he has a B.A. from York University and a
Master of Fine Arts degree in Drama, specializing in Stage Direction,
from the University of Alberta.
Alan Kay is a change management consultant specializing in corporate strategic
and operational planning, and management development issues including
customer, partner and supplier relations. He is also experienced in corporate
brand strategy and implementation.
Since founding The Glasgow Group in 1993, his busy consulting
practice counts some of Canada ’s largest organizations among its clients.
Strongly focused on accelerating strategic and human change using existing
resources his work is widely influenced by the theory and application
of Solution Focus to encourage attitudinal and behavioural change within
an organization, and to help corporate and individual clients become more
strategically focused. Some of his recent solutions focus consulting
work has been featured in the book The Solutions Focus, by Paul Z. Jackson
and Dr. Mark McKergow.
As a former senior executive in the advertising and marketing communications
industry,
Alan was Managing Director of the high profile Toronto advertising agency,
Harrod & Mirlin and before that he held a variety of client management
roles at McCann Erickson and Foster Advertising.
An experienced facilitator, he is an enthusiastic advocate of roundtable
discussions. Deeply committed to sharing his wide knowledge and experience
in marketing communications and strategic management, Alan also teaches
Advertising Strategy to executive development students at the Schulich
School of Business, York University.
PostStone
The Glasgow Group |