Executive Summary
“We need to get out of commodity selling and earn the right
to be advisers. We need to be more productive, make better use of CRM
and other tools.” – Taimour Zaman, President, the Access Group
and Producer of the Leaders Knowledge Exchange Roundtable on Wealth Management,
Toronto, January 26, 2005
Wealth management in Canada has seen rapid growth over several decades.
However, as the industry matures, a number of issues are becoming visible
that may have gone unnoticed during the growth years.
The Investment Adviser relationship – forward to the client and
back to the organization – is one of these issues, judging by the
comments of the participants in the Wealth Management Leaders
Knowledge Exchange Roundtable held in Toronto on January 26.
As Taimour Zaman identified in his opening remarks, the IA has a pivotal
role in the middle ground between the wealth management firm and the
client, and is integral to winning or losing both continuing and new
clients.
The Roundtable participants, an industry panel of seven experts and
an audience of some 75 industry players, came up with some fundamental
conclusions about the business and technology, including:
- The use of customer relationship and other tools with back
end data support is growing, but there are still technology black-out
areas in the front line
- Technology is ‘table stakes’ to get the IA in front
of the client - significant emphasis was placed on developing people
skills for dealing with clients
- In this regard, wealth management is evolving to be all about
the underlying connection to the brand and the firm - human relationships
and creating trust
- Intergeneration relationships and connecting with family are a
critical preoccupation of the wealth management industry today
- Both differentiation and commonality were advocated for improving
the client experience – and both may indeed be required in delivering
the customer experience
- Every adviser essentially working at his or her own business – traditionally
seen as a revenue generator – in the emerging market place is also
a recipe for conflicts
Technology will continually improve understanding of customers, according
to the roundtable participants, but people skills, not just technology,
will take on added importance in building client relationships. This
idea of balancing soft skills with technology is a theme outlined in
the rest of this document.
Setting the Scene
Three decades of sustained growth have made Canadian Wealth Management
a substantial industry. Today, more than two million households in Canada
have investment assets of $100,000 or more, according to Boston Consulting
Group data.
|
Technology has benefited wealth management
in an incremental rather than a revolutionary fashion…
Part of the reason for stability is that the Investment Adviser
remains the focal point in the broker-client relationship. |
Wealth management seems to enjoy remarkable stability, at least compared
with other industries that are struggling with disruptive innovation
from low cost foreign competitors and technology.
Technology seems to have benefited wealth management in an incremental
more than revolutionary way. It has enabled new product flow. It has
led to increasingly sophisticated analysis, decision and trading tools
on the desktop. It has provided communications technology that can make
the IA somewhat location independent. It has increased knowledge through
real time price discovery for all, easy access to research, investment
news alerts, and complex client and investment financial modeling. It
has enabled back offices to provide faster and more accurate transaction
processing that in turn feeds more powerful data warehouses with customer
and other data. While it has improved client access through the web,
this has so far had less effect on competitive market rankings than might
have been anticipated.
Anchored by the “know your customer” rule, the IA delivers
a one-to-one personal service to clients – much as in the past,
largely based on market trends and investment styles. Compensation has
generally been good. Full service is in good demand in Canada, in contrast
to some European markets that have seen cut backs in full service offerings
to middle and low end investors in response to profitability concerns.
The pace of wealth management change has picked up recently. Baby boomers
are moving into middle age, pension risk is being transferred to individuals,
and management expenses are starting to be squeezed.
Although large banks and insurance companies have been consolidating
the industry, wealth management is still broadly based, with numerous
mutual funds, investment managers, financial planners, discount brokers,
and investment advisers. Growth seems set to continue, but the industry
may have to work even smarter to sustain profitability.
Customer Relationship Tools
Our research is telling us that wealth management growth strategies
are being held back by project misalignments – projects poorly
aligned to the needs of customers and processes not keeping pace with
Investment Adviser and customer experience needs.
The Roundtable posed the tools & technology question right away – where
are the Customer Relationship Management tools today, and where do we
want to be with them?
Rick Wolfe made the point that wealth management has traditionally been
supported by direct marketing rather than CRM. He said that CRM has developed
relatively slowly in wealth management and has been declared dead more
than once. Even today, it is still quite hard to fix on a definition
of CRM. “What impact will CRM tools have over the next 12 to 18
months?” he asked the full audience.
|
A variety of increasingly powerful analytic
and decisioning tools are being placed on IA desktops, and a
positive shift in IA attitudes to the firm and the client on
hearing they will have a system. |
According to John Parsons from SAS, one of the Roundtable sponsors,
technology is being addressed in both bank and non-bank firms. There
is widespread integration of information and transfer of it to Investment
Advisers and customer, but we have to work on integrating knowledge and
systems into the management process — where the customer defines
the relationship. There are a variety of increasingly powerful analytic
and decisioning tools being placed on IA desktops, and a positive shift
in IA attitudes to the firm and the client on hearing they will have
a system.
It was pointed out that desired data is not always captured by the systems.
When it does exist in central systems, it can still be quite difficult
to access at the IA desktops to maximize their business.
The Panel was brought into the discussion. Nick
Mancini of Connor Clark
and Lunn advocates sophisticated management sciences and databases to
address the challenge of integrating all the information and using it
to optimize relationships. Advisers and managers know their client but
the system is often inadequate to link them properly to the back office.
Connor Clark is working from the institutional to the retail upper mid-market,
targeting relationships selectively, and is placing increased emphasis
on scientific analysis of all kinds of data – including market,
client and transaction data.
Jay Slade’s RBC Dominion Securities modifies bank tools to work
with IAs, even bringing in outside tools to make the process work better.
While he sees some IAs collecting data but not using it adequately, he
believes it is the job of the firm to make sure the systems work. However,
he acknowledged that CRM tools often work best on a large scale, making
it more difficult to use effectively in wealth management.
Complex product sets and delivering an excellent client experience require
extremely effective systems, with excellent people to run them. TD Waterhouse’s
Bill Fulton sees systems as important, but they need to be aligned from
the top of the organization and motivate staff to do what is best for
the client. CRM will make the hand-off from channel to channel easier
in understanding the actual client situation.
Technology or relationships
The IA conversation with the client is just as important as the CRM
tools. The focus, a participant said, should be on the customer’s
major life events and human factors, both of which affect the individual’s
wealth management strategy.
The Panel, mostly from the business side, agreed. While they want a
balance between technology tools and people skills, the non-technology
aspects of the client relationship are clearly pressing for them.
|
Do not forget the people in front of the client
and their skills. Focus less on the information age, and bridge
the soft skills gap of how best to deal with people. |
Terry Jenkins, who runs the private client business for BMO Harris,
sees the need to be much more disciplined in what we do. For him, technology
is only ‘table stakes’ to get the IA in front of the client.
There is a danger of spending too much time on technology, thereby leaving
information on the table. He has easy access to information combined with
incredible purchasing power, but he wants transparency so that we do
not forget the people in front of the client and their skills and imagination
to bridge the technology. People skills and soft skills of the front
line people are most important – the middle ground has much value
in this discussion. Focus less on the information age, he advised, and
bridge the soft skills gap of how best to deal with people.
National Bank’s Reg Jackson reinforced this point with the benefit
of first hand knowledge as a producing branch manager and recruiter of
what advisers are looking for and what platforms other firms are providing.
Alan Kay, of the Glasgow Group, added that in a growing firm, business
systems must reinforce the brand to get front line people connected and
tending the whole relationship. Business today is about change around
client experience and branding. When you have forty thousand clients,
you still need to have a relationship with each one of them, and this
means reframing the way the business is run, especially with experts
on client business.
Similarly, Mario Frankovich, Burgeonvest Securities, sees CRM not so
much being about hardware and software, rather about human relationships
and creating trust.
Nick Mancini described how wealth management is evolving at his firm
to be all about the underlying relationship to the brand and the firm.
He wants to see more specific wealth management, not just asset management,
which takes in the whole household balance sheet and financial needs.
Bill Fulton emphasized the importance of mining a data base in a bank
with 10 million clients all with wealth needs.
While the Panel certainly spoke for a combination of technology and
soft skills, we need to be concerned about a possibly lingering distinction
between IT and the business people in wealth management.
Does function perhaps colour preference for the one or the other, rather
than view client information and the tools to process the information
as interdependent? We need to be sure that the traditional wealth management
technology and business cultural divide is being fully addressed.
Servicing Generational Change
|
By building trust, when the “event” occurs
they can come to you as trusted adviser. |
Changing demographics have made inter-generation relationships and
connecting with the investor’s family a preoccupation of the wealth management
industry today. Bill Fulton recommends investing in training on how to
understand clients better and conduct a client diagnostic. It is crucial
to understand clients’ dreams, build their wealth plan, deepen
the adviser relationship, and know the whole family context.
Wealth management is in the forefront of demographic changes as the
pre-war generation leaves the stage to baby boomers. This opens up the
question of how to deal with wealth moving on to someone else who may
have never been previously consulted by an IA. In this “great wealth
transfer,” will CRM help or hurt?
For Bill Fulton, broad personal contact is a prerequisite. As an IA,
the relationship should not be just with the “patriarch,” you
must know the family and other generations, and make sure the data is
in the system. By building the relationship more broadly, when the “event” occurs
they can come to you as a trusted adviser. Mario Frankovich concurs. However,
it can depend on at what age you inherit. Younger people can and do use
a do-it-yourself channel. It is not until the late 50s that people tend
to seek advice and have a service relationship. The “nightmare” for
the IA is that, if a client’s son and daughter develop an advisery
relationship elsewhere, the IA is left with just form filing.
Alan Kay pointed out the children will also exhibit behavioural differences.
Reg Jackson stressed the need for continuity, with teams of advisers
not just individual advisers, especially as the adviser will not be there
forever.
For Nick Mancini, meeting the entire household is critical, for continuity
comparable to a family lawyer or doctor. He pointed out that attrition
typically runs in the range of only one to two per cent with a household relationship,
compared to about 10 per cent for the rest of financial services. Ninety per cent of his
new business comes from referrals, emphasizing the importance of client
relationships and retention.
Terry Jenkins uses a CRM predictive model to assess retention and attrition
probabilities. A good CRM data base platform will support this. Jay
Slade likewise goes through the data base regularly, and may notice a client
without children and perhaps alert the IA to the opportunity to lay down
a service. He will visit the client at the IA request and conduct a discovery
process. He stressed that the IA still controls the client relationship.
The Channel & Segment Experience
The network is an essential part of client experience. In fact, we are
competing with a series of networks. Who builds the best network to create
a client experience locks in loyalty and gets clients to stay with the
organization. Marketing strategy is paying increasing attention to the
client experience and rebuilding processes to reinforce value where the
client wants it.
Today, it needs to be part of everyone’s job. The participants
made it clear that they expect that everyone will soon have CRM systems
and use the data to enrich the potential and actual client experience
and differentiate the firm’s service. It was pointed out that clients
judge the experience they receive not just against other wealth management
providers but against experiences in all industries. Client experience
is less about one organization, according to Terry
Jenkins.
A diagnostic based on systems information helps Bill
Fulton transport
the client relationship to the right channel. For Reg
Jackson, the rhetoric
about the message and the client experience is increasingly becoming
the same across the industry. Since clients are different, the systems
must be able to differentiate their characteristics and needs. He added
that one indicator of client needs segmentation is that high net worth
clients want it immediately.
Mario Frankovich agreed that everyone is unique but advocates bringing
it down to commonalities. The IA and the clients will be happier eventually.
It helps ensure the broker role is fulfilled – whether as discount
broker or service channel – irrespective of size of client.
|
Marketing strategy is paying increasing attention
to the client experience and rebuilding processes to reinforce
value where the client wants it. |
Commonality is aimed at ensuring that no one gets less, according to
Nick Mancini, but you have to tailor service for wealthier tiers. The
result is that you struggle with image and branding. In this environment
boutiques continue to win, because for the larger players segmentation
is too broad around their intended image so the IAs do not define themselves
clearly.
Bill Fulton added that in client segmentation there needs to be a minimum
standard for every customer, so that we can tier service levels and service
based on needs, size, life cycle, etc.
Target the segment profile at the front end, advises Nick
Mancini. Today,
this may be done to satisfy a compliance requirement but compliance brings
the benefit that the data becomes a great knowledge base. You can translate
the data into better marketing and sales activities. He noted that permission-based marketing is well entrenched in the U.S. and is coming to Canada,
so it is only a matter of time before everyone will need relationship
and profiling capabilities.
Working with the Investment Adviser
|
Every adviser essentially is working at his
or her own business |
A participant described a widespread challenge in wealth management – every
adviser essentially is working at his or her own business. This has broad
implications both for how the firm’s brand is portrayed to clients
and for continuity of the firm-client relationship.
For example, this can translate into client ownership concerns in case
the IA moves to another firm, taking the client along too. This can also
create an obstacle in implementing the firm’s strategy. There may
be a significant gap between business strategy goals and actions of senior
management and those of the IA. It suggests that it may often be hard
to get sufficient traction in the front line for management intentions
in changing organizational culture, work practices, and branding.
Paying systems attention to IA data needs is an obvious way to engage
the IAs more closely. As noted earlier, a positive shift in IA attitudes
to the firm can result from hearing they will have a system.
Discussions during the first breakout session raise questions as to
how well this gap is being addressed in wealth management. All large
organizations experience tensions between different groups with different
objectives. However, it appears from the discussions that wealth management
is only slowly coming to grips with how to treat the IAs as full staff
members when they have previously been more like semi-autonomous operators.
Managing Front Line Talent
The need for talent management generated considerable discussion throughout
the Roundtable. Putting the customer first and converting the culture
of front line people to finding out what the customer wants, were identified
consistently as critical needs. A participant reminded us that this is
not the job of HR but a matter of setting up new customer-focused standards
to replace the standards we used to have that were more to do with technology.
The most successful firms now hire for an ability to work with clients – the
softer skills. While the back office view of IAs as being rule-averse
is old news, the new compliance regime has given it renewed visibility.
Several participants spoke of IAs being treated as liabilities instead
of the assets they most clearly are.
IAs rely on valuable information to serve their clients effectively,
but reluctance in flowing information signals a lack of trust in employees.
This is compounded by the multiplicity of regulators, which seems to
have given the “Sales Prevention department” a new reason
for existence.
|
The challenge is how to create great employees. |
Regulation should not be allowed to degenerate into policing, but instead
should concentrate on finding what works. Reg Jackson appreciates that
KYC – Know Your Customer – requires advisers to communicate
with clients correctly, but sees the system that takes them through to
the rest of the organization as being counterproductive when the required
checks and balances lead to hassle from the back office. He asked whether
compliance is starting to get in the way of communication and customer service,
leading to tension between the IA and the back office about whose client
it is. Among other things, it can cause vital information to be lost
in the shuffle.
“How can we work with a performance team towards finding customer satisfaction?” a participant asked. For Nick Mancini, the need is to hire people with
the “DNA” and resources to make it happen. The challenge
is to create great employees. For him, it is often preferable to work
with people with only two years of experience, rather than long time
employees with well entrenched habits and attitudes.
It is critical to create trust in the mind of the IAs. Mancini believes in building the firm’s image for the IA, and validating
the firm’s service proposition. The key to success is connecting
to the client and the client’s need, and understanding how clients
value the relationship.
For this writer, a performance management practitioner, it is noteworthy
that the whole topic of talent management and career development generated
so much discussion. It reflects that it is increasingly occupying the
minds of financial services management in a more and more commoditized
market. This is evidenced also by the earlier discussion of the importance
of soft skills compared to IT solutions in adding value to the client
experience and adding competitive advantage. It is particularly encouraging
to hear this about financial service front line sales or service functions,
traditionally perhaps not always the focus of soft skills development.
Middle Space & Execution
Rick Wolfe described the middle space, where talent comes face to face
with the client. It is at this intersection between two parties who are
dependent on each other that execution becomes the differentiator.
The participants see this as a matter of team work – alignment,
traction, direction, and getting service to keep pace with customer requirements.
Don Allen, a participant with National Bank, sees the middle ground as
helping to establish consistency of treatment across the country. For example,
big companies need to work according to a life cycle approach, with CRM
consolidating all the relationships and assets of a client across the
whole spectrum of financial services. This would win against competition
for assets by facilitating bringing in different experts to deal with
sophisticated needs.
|
It is a matter of alignment, traction, direction,
and getting service to keep pace with customer requirements |
Various IAs, rather than always competing, can work together as a team
to accomplish more, said Monica Schmidt from the Janus
Group, a Roundtable
sponsor, following up on Bill Fulton’s ideas on alignment at TD
Waterhouse. CRM and technology strategies tend to be somewhat disconnected
so it is important to build the systems to support bringing people together.
Quality of execution is critical, but it is important to recognize that
not every client wants the same service level, e.g. some may want a single
IA while others might want to deal with multiple IAs for different
investments and not have the conversations overlap.
Alignment requires getting the ducks in a row before execution, because
there is a high switching factor based on the trust of the customer.
As noted earlier, the client tends to follow the IA, so it may be very
important to retain the IA. This ties in with an earlier comment by Mario
Frankovich that to get more information to use with client relationship
software and hardware tools, there must be trust and no conflict of interest.
Support for Branding and Trust
Rick Wolfe raised the question as to the flexible, robust, and high
integrity set of resources needed to back up the IA in supporting the
brand promise. Nick Mancini sees the firm’s advice proposition
that leads to branding the firm, and making the connections with the
client.
He also sees the wealth management structure getting closer to retail,
and integrating with retail CRM knowledge all the way down to teller.
This will include transactions, service, and a recommendation of the
next logical offer. Customer satisfaction is still the goal of senior
management, along with employee satisfaction which was often debated
and fought against in the past, but now is starting to gain acceptance.
Alan Kay acknowledges that talking about and living such ideas helps
in bringing about success, but only if everyone is operating off the
same principles. He welcomed the move by big organizations to appoint
a Chief Marketing Officer, and even more a chief branding officer.
Terry Jenkins believes that ability depends less on the size of business and more on the ability to execute. The proof is in the way he runs a boutique
operation very successfully inside a big bank. The alignment is critical
when you consider the needs of boutique customers. They are looking for
something they can’t get in large organizations, a process around
one focal point to deal with.
Is there loyalty any more? The cost of acquiring a costumer is huge,
meaning you need to keep the client for a long time to recoup that cost.
The Panel reiterated that trust is the challenge – between the
customer and the IA and the firm at every level. We need brand building
around trust and advice. The building of systems and an image that validates
trust will define us – and we can make it happen through the alignment
of the organization.
Summing It Up
The Sponsors summarized the key learnings at the Roundtable as follows:
- Adventis – customers can help us understand business
needs
- Ivey – progress is being made in elevating the role of branding,
reducing silos, and being willing to discriminate among customers
needs; but customers see more transparency and use electronic channels and give
their loyalty to providers who never see their customers
- Hydrogen Creative - the IA model is a moving target today; ‘relationship’ is
a marketing and sales issue that requires understanding the relationship
building process; generic services are easier for IAs to take with
them
- SAS – it is good to hear such emphasis on the client experience;
the key is not great IA talents with great execution, or great technologies – but
a marriage of both
- IQ Partners – a people lens is required; there will be an
evolution of the individual –who used to be either marketer, analyst,
or IT professional – to hybrid marketer who understands EQ
and IT
- Institute of Canadian Bankers – the classic course model
is not the way people learn any more; we must help people manage people – with
a learning environment that supports client service and linkage of
employee and customers
- Janus Group – alignment is needed from the top of house
down, reinforcing loyalty factors in both IAs and customers
- Navantis – recognize that vendors want to be at the table
as a partner, and have value from knowledge of other industries and
potential intelligence
- ThinData - banks tend to work within themselves so may lack connections;
they should use vendors as connectors to help find solutions, and
leverage experience
Any conversation is only as good as the participants and panellists.
The Access Group thanks the executives from all the organizations listed
below for taking time from their schedules to add to our collective understanding,
and for the enthusiasm they brought to the conversation.
Robert Angel
January 26, 2006
Roundtable Support
Panel
Nick Mancini, Conner Clark & Lunn
Reg Jackson, Vice President, National Bank Financial
Alan Kay, Principal, The Glasgow Group
Terry Jenkins, Senior Vice President and Executive Managing Director,
BMO Harris Private Banking
Mario Frankovich, President & CEO, Burgeonvest Securities Limited
Bill Fulton, President, Private Client Group, TD Waterhouse
Jay Slade, Vice President, RBC Dominion Securities
Presented by:
The Institute of Canadian Bankers
Richard Ivey School of Business-Executive Development program
The Access Group
Sponsors:
IQ Partners
Navantis Inc.
ThinData Inc.
SAS Institute
The Janus Group
Hydrogen Creative
Faculty:
Taimour Zaman (taimour@accessgroup.com.cn): Producer of the Roundtable
Founder of The Access Group and specialist in customer executive education
sessions and qualitative research for industry and technology companies.
Rick Wolfe (rick.wolfe@poststone.com): Facilitator
Founder of PostStone and a consultant in brand research, customer advisory
processes, cultural change, new product development, and kitchen table
conversations.
Robert Angel (bob.angel@gilfordgrp.com): Report
President of The Gilford Group Limited and subject matter expert in customer
marketing strategies, performance management, culture change, and organizational
development.
© The Access Group, January 2006,
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction without this copyright notice
is prohibited. Opinions expressed herein reflect judgment at the time
of writing and are subject to change. Registered trademarks are
the property of their respective companies. |